![]() ![]() Four theories have been advanced to account for this:ġ. It is regrettable that exaggerated accounts of human penile size and shape have been used to bolster the proposition that sexual selection has moulded the evolution of the human genitalia and the psychological mechanisms that influence copulatory behaviour. None of these statements, and many others of a similar nature which pervade the published literature, is accurate, with the exception of the observation that the thickness of the human penis exceeds that of the apes. Miller (2000), in a book dealing with effects of sexual selection on evolution of the human brain, states that 'adult male humans have the longest, thickest and most flexible penises of any living primate'. ![]() semen coagulation ratings in primates, including H. Macaque Orangutan Gibbon Colobus monkey Gorilla Semen coagulation ratingįigure 3.18 Correlations between the rate of evolution of the semenogelin 2 gene, and A. Jolly (1999) states that a 'peculiarity of humans is that the penis is twice the size for body weight as that of any other primate.' Baker and Bellis (like Smith) stressed that 'it is nearly twice as long and over twice as wide as that of the chimpanzee'. Smith (1984) regarded the human penis as 'extraordinary relative to the other hominoids'. It is an unfortunate circumstance that so many authors have applied hyperbole to descriptions of human penile morphology. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |